SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2071

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Abhay Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Ms. Avya Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Rajat Dave, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Mahendra Vishnoi, Advocate

ORDER :

(Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.)

Learned counsel for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the present petition is no more res-integra, being covered by the decision rendered by this Court in Jaswant Sharma & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6131/2023) along with other connected matters, decided on 06.06.2023, the operative portion of which is reproduced as hereunder:-

    "5. Heard learned counsel for the parties as well as perused the record of the case along with judgments cited at the Bar.

    6. This Court observes that the petitioners ran the nursing courses for various academic years till the academic session 2022-23 and the affiliation/recognition for running the Courses in question has been granted by the respondent-INC and the petitioners did not get any NOC from the State Government. Thereafter, the respondent-RNC vide the impugned order 13.01.2022 has cancelled the affiliation of the petitioners on ground that the petitioners have not obtained the requisite No Objection Certificate from the State Government.

    7. This Court further observes that aggrieved by the aforesaid order, petitioners preferred the writ petition, which was decide

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top