Back
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Ramesh Kumar Mehta – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. relief sought in criminal application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner faced judicial custody despite conversion of warrant. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. violation of court orders demands action against judicial officer. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court observes judicial indiscipline and right to liberty. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. calling for an explanation from the chief judicial magistrate. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. next steps for compliance and scheduling. (Para 14 , 15) |
ORDER :
(Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.)
The instant application has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:-
The issuance of non-bailable warrants and proclamations must adhere to legal standards, including the necessity of an execution report and clear directives for appearance.
The legality of warrants for arrest in non-bailable offences and the requirement for the Magistrate to specify the place and date where the accused has to appear in compliance with the proclamation u....
(1) In bailable offence, right of accused to get bail is absolute and indefeasible right and courts have no discretion in granting bail.(2) Criminal Courts should consider bail applications particula....
The issuance of warrants and proclamations against an accused must comply with established legal requirements; failure to do so results in quashing those orders.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
