Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Sandeep Saw @ Sandeep Kumar, S/o Daleshwar Sao – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a prayer to quash five different orders passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Forest Case No. 15 of 2011.
3. The brief facts of the case is that the petitioner is an accused of the said Forest Case No. 15 of 2011 in which cognizance has been taken by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bermo at Tenughat vide order dated 26.03.2012 against the petitioners of having committed the offences punishable under Section 33 , 41 & 42 of the Indian FOREST ACT , 1927. Consequent upon cognizance, summons was issued to the petitioner but without receipt of the service report of the summon issued to the petitioner, vide order dated 16.10.2012, the learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat issued bailable warrant of arrest against the petitioner. In the said case, on 21.06.2014, without the execution report of the bailable warrant of arrest, having been received in the court, the learned Judicial Magistrate directed for issue of non-ba
The issuance of warrants and proclamations against an accused must comply with established legal requirements; failure to do so results in quashing those orders.
The issuance of non-bailable warrants and proclamations must adhere to legal standards, including the necessity of an execution report and clear directives for appearance.
The issuance of non-bailable warrants and proclamations must comply with legal standards, including recorded satisfaction of evasion and specification of time and place for appearance.
The issuance of non-bailable warrants and proclamations must comply with legal requirements, including recording satisfaction of evasion and specifying time and place for appearance.
Court must comply with mandatory requirements of law when issuing orders under Sections 82 and 83 of the Cr.P.C., or such orders will be quashed.
The main legal point established is that the issuance of a proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. requires the Judicial Magistrate to record satisfaction of the accused persons' absconding or conceali....
Mandatory legal requirements must be adhered to when issuing proclamations and attachment orders under the Code of Criminal Procedure, or they will be quashed as illegal.
The issuance of non-bailable warrants and proclamations must comply with mandatory legal requirements, including recording satisfaction of evading arrest and specifying time and place for appearance.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
