SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2039

FARJAND ALI
Ramzan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Asbwin Garg
For the Respondent: Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT :

Farjand Ali, J.

Heard learned Counsel for the accused appellant and learned Public Prosecutor on the application for suspension of sentence and perused the Judgement impugned dated 28.6.2022 passed by Special Judge (N.D.P.S. cases), Bharatpur in Sessions case No. 38/2019 (CIS-42/2019) whereby the accused appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 8 /20(b)(II)(c) of NDPS Act, 1985 and has been sentenced with maximum of Eleven years rigorous imprisonment along with fine of Rs. 1,00,000/-.

2. Learned Counsel for the accused-appellant submits that the Trial Court has grossly erred in convicting and sentencing the accused-appellant. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that a false case has been foisted against the petitioner. Section 2 of the NDPS Act contains the definitions and clause (III) of the same defined what "cannabis (hemp)" means through three sub-clauses. The sub-clause (b) of clause (iii) defines 'ganja' as "the flowering or fruiting tops of the cannabis plant (excluding the seeds and leaves when not accompanied by the tops), by whatever name they may be known or designated." He avers that, for the purpose of determining the total

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top