Shambhu Lal vs State of Rajasthan - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 2131

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2131

FARJAND ALI
Shambhu Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Abhishek Charan.
For the Respondent: Mr. Anees Bhurat, P.P.

Table of Content
1. conviction and sentence under rajasthan excise act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioners' plea for leniency in sentencing. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's observations on conviction and sentencing factors. (Para 6 , 7)
4. modification of sentence based on justice. (Para 8)
5. partial allowance of the revision petition. (Para 9)

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

By way of filing the instant Criminal Revision Petition challenge has been made to the judgment dated 10.05.2005 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, No.1, Chittorgarh in Criminal appeal No.17/2005, whereby the learned appellate court affirmed the judgment dated 10.03.2005 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Chittorgarh in Criminal Regular Case No.777/2003, whereby the petitioners have been convicted for the offence under Section 16 /54 of the RAJASTHAN EXCISE ACT and sentenced to undergo 6 months' simple imprisonment alongwith a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo simple imprisonment of one month.

2. Bereft of elaborate details, facts relevant and essential for disposal of the instant criminal revision are that the Excise Inspector submitted a charge-sheet in the competent court t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document