Mohanlal vs State of Rajasthan - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 2125

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2125

FARJAND ALI
Mohanlal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Pradeep Shah, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mukhtyar Khan, P.P.

JUDGMENT :

Farjand Ali, J.

The instant criminal revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved of the judgment dated 23.05.2001 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhinmal in Criminal Appeal No.30/2000, whereby the learned appellate court while affirming the judgment dated 13.09.2000 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Sanchore, in Criminal Regular Case No.436/1997 convicting the petitioner for the offence under Section 19 /54 of the RAJASTHAN EXCISE ACT , reduced the sentence for the said offence from two years' simple imprisonment to one year's simple imprisonment and maintained the fine amount of Rs.500/- and default sentence of one month's simple imprisonment.

2. Bereft of elaborate details, facts relevant and essential for disposal of the instant criminal revision are that Mr. Satishchandra, Deputy Superintendent of Police, sent a report on 11.03.1997 to the effect that on that day, on the information of an informant, he along with police party departed from Sanchore at 06.30 p.m. for conducting Nakabandi and sent SHO Kan Singh with police personnel to conduct Nakabandi at pahadpura. On the way, a suspected Jeep was seen, w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document