SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 244

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Badrinarayan, S/o Rukmal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Ms. Kirti Pareek, Mr. N.L. Joshi.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP.

JUDGMENT :

1. Instant revision petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the judgment dated 17.09.2008 passed in Cr. Appeal No.14/2005 by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Raisinghnagar District Sriganganagar (hereinafter referred to as ‘the appellate court’) by which the appellate court while dismissing the petitioners’ appeal, upheld the judgment dated 03.03.2005 passed in Cr. Case No.216/2002 by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Shri Vijaynagar, District Sriganganagar (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial court’) whereby, the learned trial court convicted the present petitioners for offence under Section 16/54(A)(C)(D) of Rajasthan Excise Act and sentenced each of them to undergo two years’ R.I. and imposed a fine of Rs.1000/- each and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo four months’ S.I.

2. Brief facts of the case are that while investigating in another matter, on 04.01.2002, Shri Ram Pratap, SHO, PS Sri Vijaynagar reached at the field of one Udaram and where he found the present petitioners preparing country-made liquor on a ‘Bhatti’ without any permit or licence. After collecting the samples of country-made liquor and on completion of usual proced

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top