SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2115

FARJAND ALI
Mukh Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. O.P. Kumawat.
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA.

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

The instant criminal revision petition under Section 397 /401 CrPC has been preferred by the appellants to challenge the judgment dated 17.10.2019 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Churu, whereby he dismissed Criminal Appeal No.46/2016 preferred by the accused appellants and affirmed the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 12.02.2015 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Churu in Criminal Case No.878/2011, whereby they were convicted for the offences under Sections 34 1, 323/34, 324/34 and 325/34 of the IPC, however, instead of sending them to jail, they were granted the benefit of probation under section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act and it was directed that they shall remain on probation for a period of two years subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- and a surety in the like amount and further under section 5 of the Probation of Offenders Act, each of the accused appellant was directed to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (in total Rs.75,000/-) to be disbursed to the complainant as compensation.

2. Succinctly stating facts of the case are that on 26.01.2009 at 05.15 p.m., complainant Omprakash submitted

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top