Mukh Ram vs State of Rajasthan - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 2115

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2115

FARJAND ALI
Mukh Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. O.P. Kumawat.
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA.

Table of Content
1. challenging previous conviction decision. (Para 1)
2. details of the assault incident. (Para 2 , 3)
3. conviction process and findings. (Para 4)
4. arguments for acquittal and compensation. (Para 5)
5. counterarguments by the prosecution. (Para 6)
6. court's reasoned analysis and decision. (Para 7 , 8)
7. affirmation of previous judgments. (Para 9)
8. record handling after judgment. (Para 10)

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

The instant criminal revision petition under Section 397 /401 CrPC has been preferred by the appellants to challenge the judgment dated 17.10.2019 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Churu, whereby he dismissed Criminal Appeal No.46/2016 preferred by the accused appellants and affirmed the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 12.02.2015 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Churu in Criminal Case No.878/2011, whereby they were convicted for the offences under Sections 34 1, 323/34, 324/34 and 325/34 of the IPC, however, instead of sending them to jail, they were granted the benefit of probation under section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act and it was directed that they shall remain on probation for a period of two years

Click Here to Read the rest of this document