SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2104

FARJAND ALI
Rameshwarlal – Appellant
Versus
Bhagu Ram – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Kapil Bissa, on behalf of Mr. Ranjeet Joshi.
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA.

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

The instant criminal revision petition under Section 397 and 401 of the CrPC has been preferred by the petitioner complainant to assail the judgment dated 03.11.2001 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Merta in Criminal Appeal No.7/2001, whereby the learned appellate court allowed the appeal preferred on behalf of the respondents and set aside the judgment dated 08.03.2001 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Merta in Criminal Case No.343/2000 and acquitted them from the offences under Sections 451 and 427 IPC.

2. Bereft of elaborate details, succinctly stated facts of the case, which are necessary for the disposal of the instant revision petition are that the petitioner complainant submitted a written report (Ex.P/1) at the Police Station Merta City on 01.08.2000 alleging inter alia that on 22.07.2000 at about 07.00 p.m., while he had gone to his house, the respondents armed with lathis came to his cabin, which was being used as a barber shop, broke the glass and threw the chairs, which caused him a loss of Rs.2000/-. While the respondents were causing damage, he reached there and tried to stop the accused, upon which, accused Bhagur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top