Rameshwarlal vs Bhagu Ram - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 2104

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2104

FARJAND ALI
Rameshwarlal – Appellant
Versus
Bhagu Ram – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Kapil Bissa, on behalf of Mr. Ranjeet Joshi.
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA.

Table of Content
1. overview of case facts and charges. (Para 1 , 2)
2. appeal process and judgment by the learned appellate court. (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments from the petitioner and support from the public prosecutor. (Para 5 , 6)
4. court's observations on evidence and reasoning. (Para 7 , 8 , 10)
5. conclusion dismissing the revision petition. (Para 9 , 11)

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

The instant criminal revision petition under Section 397 and 401 of the CrPC has been preferred by the petitioner complainant to assail the judgment dated 03.11.2001 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Merta in Criminal Appeal No.7/2001, whereby the learned appellate court allowed the appeal preferred on behalf of the respondents and set aside the judgment dated 08.03.2001 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Merta in Criminal Case No.343/2000 and acquitted them from the offences under Sections 451 and 427 IPC.

2. Bereft of elaborate details, succinctly stated facts of the case, which are necessary for the disposal of the instant revision petition are that the petitioner complainant submitted a written report (Ex.P/1) at the Police Station Merta City on 01.08.2000 alleging inter alia t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document