SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2100

FARJAND ALI
Madan Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Praveen Vyas.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mukhtyar Khan, P.P.

Table of Content
1. conviction details and factual background of case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments for leniency and petitioners' background. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's analysis on conviction and sentencing factors. (Para 6 , 7)
4. modification of the sentence based on circumstances. (Para 8)
5. conclusion and order regarding revision petition. (Para 9 , 10)

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

The petitioners herein were convicted and sentenced by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Loonkaransar vide judgement dated 23.09.1998 passed in Criminal Regular Case No.172/1991 in the following manner :-

Offence for which convicted

Sentence, fine and default sentence

Section 341 of the IPC

One month's rigorous imprisonment

Section 323 of the IPC

Three months' rigorous imprisonment

Section 325 of the IPC

Two years' rigorous imprisonment along with a fine of Rs.1, 000/- and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo three months' simple imprisonment

They preferred an appeal giving challenge to the aforesaid judgement, which came to be partly allowed by the learned Special Judge, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities Cases) and Ad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top