SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1930

INDERJEET SINGH
Aarti Dhobi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Babu Lal Bairwa.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ugra Sen Yadav.

ORDER :

(Inderjeet Singh, J.)

The petitioner, as alleged in the petition, was minor at the time of alleged incident and belongs to SC/ST category, became victim and subjected to the crime for which punishment has been prescribed under the INDIAN PENAL CODE . On being denied the financial aid by the impugned order dated 15.04.2021 passed by the respondents, the petitioner victim has approached this Court seeking financial aid as provided under clause-44(ii) of the Schedule annexed with the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995 (hereinafter to be referred as the Rules of 1995).

2. Brief facts as reflected from the material on record are that with regard to the crime committed on the victim, uncle of the victim lodged FIR bearing No.07/2017 at Police Station Renwal, Jaipur Rural for the offence under Sections 3 63 , 366, 376, 120-B of IPC, Section 3 /4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter to be referred as the Act of 2012) and Section 3 (1)(w) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter to be referred as the Act of 1989). After registratio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top