IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
SANDEEP MEHTA, YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT, JJ.
Rajani - Appellant
Versus
The Director Ayurved Department and others - Respondents
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 575 of 2022.
Decided on : 27-01-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of late appeal regarding job selection. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on the validity of obc certificates for selection. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court analysis of certificate validity and its prospective application. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. dismissal of appeal due to lack of merit. (Para 8) |
ORDER :
Mr. Sandeep Mehta, J. - The instant intra court appeal, which is delayed by 39 days, is preferred by the appellant writ petitioner for assailing the order dated 23.02.2022 passed by the learned Single Bench whereby, the writ petition seeking a direction upon the respondents to treat the appellant as an OBC (Female) Divorcee category candidate and to consider her claim for selection on the post of Compounder/Nurse Junior Grade with all consequential benefits, was dismissed.
2. The appellant writ petitioner applied for the post of Compounder/Nurse Junior Grade in the category of OBC (Non- Creamylayer) Divorcee category in pursuance of the advertisement dated 17.06.2021 issued by Directorate, Ayurveda Department, Rajasthan, Ajmer. She was called for document verification, however, her name did not figure in the provisional merit list of the Unreserved category candidates/OBC (NCL) category candidates. She filed an objection to the respondents stating inter alia that candidate having obtained 45.08% marks had been selected in the category of OBC (NCL) Divorcees whereas the name of the appellant writ petitioner having obtained 47.90% marks was not reflected in the select list. However, the objection was not considered favourably. In this background, the writ petition came to be filed seeking a direction upon the respondents for including the name of the appellant writ petitioner in the select list. The writ petition was rejected by learned Single Bench vide order dated 23.02.2022 which is assailed in this intra court appeal.
3. Learned counsel Shri Swami representing the appellant writ petitioner submits that the certificates dated 15.12.2017 and 02.08.2021 were submitted by the appellant petitioner, who was a divorcee, indicating her status as OBC (NCL) category and hence, the respondents were under an obligation to consider her candidature in the said category. He submits that the learned Single Judge erred in affirming decision of the respondents in denying appointment to the petitioner in the said category for the reason that the certificates produced by the appellant petitioner were not compliant of the condition contained in the recruitment notification that the OBC (NCL) certificate issued after the cut-off date will not taken into consideration. He drew the Court's attention to the circular dated 17.10.2022 issued by the Department of Personnel, State of Rajasthan which reads as below:
^^bl foHkkx }kjk lela[;d ifji= dzekad ia- 7¼1½ dkfeZd@d&2@2019 fnukad 20-01-2022 esa fuEukuqlkj tkjh fd;k x;k Fkk%&
^^jkT; ljdkj dh v/khu inksa dh HkrhZ ds fy, lHkh lsok fu;eksa esa vuqlwfpr tkfr] vuqlwfpr tutkfr] vU; fiNMk oxZ] vfr fiNMk oxZ ,oa vkfFkZd :i ls detksj oxZ ds vH;fFkZ;ksa ds fy, vkj{k.k dk izko/kku fd;k x;k gSA dsUnz ,oa jkT; ds v/khu inksa dh HkfrZ;ksa esa vkj{k.k dk ykHk izkIr djus gsrq vH;fFkZ;ksa dks lacaf/kr Js.kh ds izek.k&i= dh vko';drk gksrh gS] ftlds vk/kkj ij vH;FkhZ dh Js.kh dh ik=rk dk ewY;kadu fd;k tkrk gSA vH;fFkZ;ksa dks muds oxZ ds vkj{k.k dk ykHk] izek.k&i= tkjh gksus dh fnukad ls ns; gksrk gS vkSj vH;FkhZ ds ikl l{ke izkf/kdkjh }kjk tkjh izek.k&i=] vkosnu Hkjus dh vfUre frfFk ls iwoZ dk gksuk vko';d gSA vH;fFkZ;ksa }kjk/kkfjr izek.k&i= vkosnu Hkjus dh vfUre frfFk ls iwoZ dk gksuk pkfg;s] rkfd HkrhZ izfdz;k izkjEHk gksus ds i'pkr vkjf{kr Js.kh dk ykHk nsus ds laca/k esa izek.k&i= dh frfFk ds vk/kkj ij fookn u gksA**
mDr ifji= ds vUr esa fuEu ijUrqd tksMk tkrk gS%&
^^;fn fdUgha dkj.kksa ls vH;FkhZ }kjk vkosnu dh vfUre frfFk ,d tkjh izek.k&i= izLrqr ugha fd;k tkrk gS rFkk vfUre frfFk ds i'pkr tkjh fd;k gqvk izek.k&i= izLrqr fd;k tkrk gS rks ,sls vH;FkhZ ls bl vk'k; dk ,d 'kiFk&i= fy[kk tkosa fd og vkosnu dh
A valid OBC (NCL) certificate must be issued before the cut-off date for eligibility; the amendment allowing post-cut-off certificates applies prospectively only.
Adherence to stipulated conditions in recruitment advertisements, including the timeline for certificate issuance and financial status criteria for category eligibility, is crucial for determining ca....
The validity of a caste certificate is crucial for eligibility in recruitment, and expired certificates do not meet the necessary criteria.
The judgment established the principle that a person's OBC status is by birth and not by acquisition at a later stage, and certificates are an affirmation of existing status. It emphasized the import....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for candidates to possess valid OBC-NCL certificates within the specified timelines as per the advertisement and subsequent notice ....
A valid OBC certificate must be possessed at the time of application submission to qualify for reservation benefits, not merely at the time of document verification.
Timely submission of valid documents is crucial in establishing eligibility for OBC (NCL) category in recruitment processes.
Selected reserved category candidate qualifying written exam and producing valid category certificate at document verification cannot be denied appointment for expired certificate at application cut-....
Validity of OBC certificate, importance of caste certificates bearing the name of the parent, and inapplicability of reservation benefits through marriage
The requirement of a caste certificate bearing the name of the parent to verify the actual caste of the candidate at the time of birth is essential for claiming reservation benefits.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.