SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1996

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
SANDEEP MEHTA, YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT, JJ.
Rajani - Appellant
Versus
The Director Ayurved Department and others - Respondents
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 575 of 2022.
Decided on : 27-01-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant:- Mr. Ashvini Kumar Swami, Advocate.
For the Respondents:- Mr. Anil Kumar Gaur, AAG.

A valid OBC (NCL) certificate must be issued before the cut-off date for eligibility; the amendment allowing post-cut-off certificates applies prospectively only.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 14 - The appellant sought to be treated as an OBC (Female) Divorcee category candidate for a government post, claiming superior marks than selected candidates - The Single Bench's dismissal of her petition was upheld - Requirements for certification in employment processes reaffirmed. (Paras 1, 6, 8)

(B) Validity of Certificate - The necessity of possessing an OBC (NCL) certificate prior to the cut-off date is confirmed - The amendment allowing certificates after this date is held prospective, not retrospective. (Paras 6, 7)

Facts of the case:
The appellant applied for a position as a Compounder/Nurse Junior Grade, asserting a denial based on not being included in the merit list despite higher marks than selected candidates. She contended her status as OBC (NCL) Divorcee was not duly recognized.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the appellant did not possess a valid OBC (NCL) certificate prior to the cut-off date as required, validating the respondents' decision.

Issues: The key issues included the validity of late-issued OBC certificates and whether such certificates could be considered retrospectively.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that for eligibility in the OBC (NCL) category, a valid certificate must be issued before the cut-off date, reaffirming the non-retroactive nature of the recent circular.

Result: Appeal dismissed as delayed and lacking merit.

Table of Content
1. factual background of late appeal regarding job selection. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments on the validity of obc certificates for selection. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court analysis of certificate validity and its prospective application. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. dismissal of appeal due to lack of merit. (Para 8)

ORDER :

Mr. Sandeep Mehta, J. - The instant intra court appeal, which is delayed by 39 days, is preferred by the appellant writ petitioner for assailing the order dated 23.02.2022 passed by the learned Single Bench whereby, the writ petition seeking a direction upon the respondents to treat the appellant as an OBC (Female) Divorcee category candidate and to consider her claim for selection on the post of Compounder/Nurse Junior Grade with all consequential benefits, was dismissed.

2. The appellant writ petitioner applied for the post of Compounder/Nurse Junior Grade in the category of OBC (Non- Creamylayer) Divorcee category in pursuance of the advertisement dated 17.06.2021 issued by Directorate, Ayurveda Department, Rajasthan, Ajmer. She was called for document verification, however, her name did not figure in the provisional merit list of the Unreserved category candidates/OBC (NCL) category candidates. She filed an objection to the respondents stating inter alia that candidate having obtained 45.08% marks had been selected in the category of OBC (NCL) Divorcees whereas the name of the appellant writ petitioner having obtained 47.90% marks was not reflected in the select list. However, the objection was not considered favourably. In this background, the writ petition came to be filed seeking a direction upon the respondents for including the name of the appellant writ petitioner in the select list. The writ petition was rejected by learned Single Bench vide order dated 23.02.2022 which is assailed in this intra court appeal.

3. Learned counsel Shri Swami representing the appellant writ petitioner submits that the certificates dated 15.12.2017 and 02.08.2021 were submitted by the appellant petitioner, who was a divorcee, indicating her status as OBC (NCL) category and hence, the respondents were under an obligation to consider her candidature in the said category. He submits that the learned Single Judge erred in affirming decision of the respondents in denying appointment to the petitioner in the said category for the reason that the certificates produced by the appellant petitioner were not compliant of the condition contained in the recruitment notification that the OBC (NCL) certificate issued after the cut-off date will not taken into consideration. He drew the Court's attention to the circular dated 17.10.2022 issued by the Department of Personnel, State of Rajasthan which reads as below:

^^bl foHkkx }kjk lela[;d ifji= dzekad ia- 7¼1½ dkfeZd@d&2@2019 fnukad 20-01-2022 esa fuEukuqlkj tkjh fd;k x;k Fkk%&

^^jkT; ljdkj dh v/khu inksa dh HkrhZ ds fy, lHkh lsok fu;eksa esa vuqlwfpr tkfr] vuqlwfpr tutkfr] vU; fiNMk oxZ] vfr fiNMk oxZ ,oa vkfFkZd :i ls detksj oxZ ds vH;fFkZ;ksa ds fy, vkj{k.k dk izko/kku fd;k x;k gSA dsUnz ,oa jkT; ds v/khu inksa dh HkfrZ;ksa esa vkj{k.k dk ykHk izkIr djus gsrq vH;fFkZ;ksa dks lacaf/kr Js.kh ds izek.k&i= dh vko';drk gksrh gS] ftlds vk/kkj ij vH;FkhZ dh Js.kh dh ik=rk dk ewY;kadu fd;k tkrk gSA vH;fFkZ;ksa dks muds oxZ ds vkj{k.k dk ykHk] izek.k&i= tkjh gksus dh fnukad ls ns; gksrk gS vkSj vH;FkhZ ds ikl l{ke izkf/kdkjh }kjk tkjh izek.k&i=] vkosnu Hkjus dh vfUre frfFk ls iwoZ dk gksuk vko';d gSA vH;fFkZ;ksa }kjk/kkfjr izek.k&i= vkosnu Hkjus dh vfUre frfFk ls iwoZ dk gksuk pkfg;s] rkfd HkrhZ izfdz;k izkjEHk gksus ds i'pkr vkjf{kr Js.kh dk ykHk nsus ds laca/k esa izek.k&i= dh frfFk ds vk/kkj ij fookn u gksA**

mDr ifji= ds vUr esa fuEu ijUrqd tksMk tkrk gS%&

^^;fn fdUgha dkj.kksa ls vH;FkhZ }kjk vkosnu dh vfUre frfFk ,d tkjh izek.k&i= izLrqr ugha fd;k tkrk gS rFkk vfUre frfFk ds i'pkr tkjh fd;k gqvk izek.k&i= izLrqr fd;k tkrk gS rks ,sls vH;FkhZ ls bl vk'k; dk ,d 'kiFk&i= fy[kk tkosa fd og vkosnu dh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top