SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2298

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
VIJAY BISHNOI, J.
Virendrasingh @ Viriya - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan and ors. - Respondents
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14262 of 2023, S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13143 of 2023
Decided on : 21-12-2023

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Dilip Kumar Sharma, Mr. B. Ray Bishnoi, Advocates.
For the Respondents: Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, PP., Mr. Manas Ranchhor Khatri.

Bail should be denied when the accused misuses interim bail and the trial is ongoing, reflecting the court's concern for the integrity of the judicial process.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections pertaining to bail - The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated and lacked incriminating evidence against him - The prosecution argued the petitioner misused interim bail and was arrested after remaining absconded - Court dismissed the bail application due to ongoing prosecution evidence and misuse of bail. (Paras 2-5)

(B) Bail - The court is not inclined to grant bail when the accused has misused interim bail and the trial is ongoing. (Paras 5, 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was arrested on 18.07.2019, and the trial has not concluded despite the framing of charges on 26.04.2023. The eye witness did not name the petitioner during examination.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioner misused interim bail and that the prosecution evidence is ongoing, justifying the denial of bail.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner should be granted bail given the circumstances of his arrest and the ongoing trial.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that bail should not be granted when there is evidence of misuse of previous bail and the trial is still in progress.

Result: Bail application dismissed.

ORDER :

Mr. Vijay Bishnoi, J. - S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 14262/2023 :-

Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is argued that the eye witness namely Umesh (PW-1), in his examination-in- chief, has not named the petitioner. It is further submitted that no other incriminating evidence is available on record to suggest that the petitioner was involved in the commission of crime in any manner.

3. Learned counsel has further submitted that the petitioner was arrested on 18.07.2019 and till date, the trial against him has not been concluded. It is, therefore, prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed this bail application and argued that from the material collected by the police during the course of investigation, involvement of the petitioner in the commission of crime is writ large. It is further submitted that petitioner was enlarged on interim bail by this Court for a month, however, even after expiry of the interim bail period, the petitioner did not surrender himself before the jail authorities and remained absconded and ultimately, he was arrested after more than a year. It is also submitted that charge against the petitioner has been framed only on 26.04.2023 and prosecution evidence is going on.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration of the fact that charge has been framed against the petitioner only on 26.04.2023 and the prosecution evidence is going on and keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has misused the interim bail granted by this Court, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Hence, this bail application is dismissed.

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 13143/2023 :-

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner, without arguing the matter on merits, has submitted that he does not want to press this criminal misc. bail application, however, seeks liberty for the petitioner to file a fresh bail application before the trial court after completion of the evidence of the complainant.

8. Accordingly, this criminal misc. bail application is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty sought for.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top