SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2320

KULDEEP MATHUR
Anil – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rakesh Matoria Mr. Vikas.
For the Respondent: Mr. Shrawan Kumar, PP assisted by Ms. Kamla Goswami.

ORDER :

Mr. Kuldeep Mathur, J. - This application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.155/2022 registered at Police Station Mahila, District Hanumangarh, for offence under Sections 498A and 304B of IPC.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the FIR lodged by the complainant, omnibus allegations have been levelled against the family members of the present petitioner. Learned counsel submitted that the Police after making investigation has filed charge-sheet only against the present petitioner under Sections 498A and 304B of IPC. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Drawing attention of the Court towards the statement of the complainant and one Shri Chet Ram recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., learned counsel submitted that there is nothing on record to substantiate the allegation of demand of dowry, soon before the death of the deceased. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner and deceased had been li

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top