SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2099

FARJAND ALI
Nishant @ Rahul – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Pallav Sharma.
For the Respondent: Mr. Laxman Meena, PP.

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

The instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner- Nishant @ Rahul S/o Shree Liladhar under Section 439 Cr.P.C against the order impugned passed by learned court below in connection with FIR No. 349/2020 registered at Police Station RKPURAM, Kota, Rajasthan for the offence(s) under Sections 304-B IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this matter, owing to the sad demise of a bride at her matrimonial home otherwise he has to do nothing with the alleged offence. It is submitted that simply because a bride dies in her matrimonial home within seven years of the marriage, does not perse sufficient to draw a presumption that she was maltreated for or in connection of demand of dowry and that the demand was meted out to her soon before her death and death occurred other than in normal circumstances. It is strenuously urged that even the complainant party is not firm, what was demanded by the in laws and when the demand was made or whether the demand was fulfilled or any promise was made to fulfill at any subsequent date. There is a major discrepancy rather conflict in between the previous stat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top