SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 622

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
NARAYAN RAM @ NASRAM


Advocates:
Mr. Deepak Menaria, Mr. Mohd. Rasheed, Mr. Lalit Kishore Sen, PP, Mr. Jai Kishan for complainant

ORDER :

KULDEEP MATHUR, J.

This application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C . (483 BNSS) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.167/2024, registered at Police Station Baap, District Phalodi, for offences under Sections 85, 80(2) and 3(5) of BNS.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties at Bar. Perused the material available on record.

3. As per the prosecution, deceased- Nenu, on 16.09.2024 died in her matrimonial house in unnatural circumstances within three months of her marriage.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner who is the father in-law has been falsely implicated in the present case. There was no occasion for the petitioner to have harassed or humiliated the deceased on account of dowry demand.

5. Drawing attention of the Court towards the FIR and the challan papers, learned counsel submitted that there are omnibus allegations levelled against the present petitioner and his other family members but apart from the co-accused- Mukesh (husband) only the petitioner has been charge sheeted by the Investigating Agency and no other family member has been charge sheeted.

6. Learned counsel submitted that the dec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top