SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2177

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Chittar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S.L. Sukhwal
For the Respondent: Mukesh Trivedi

JUDGMENT :

Manoj Kumar Garg, J.

1. Instant criminal appeal has been filed by the appellants under Section 374 Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 15.03.2001 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Chittorgarh, in Sessions Case No. 8/1997 by which the learned Judge convicted and sentenced each of the appellants as under:

Offence under Section 326/34 IPC

Three years' R.I. and a fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default of payment of fine, further undergo two months' S.I.

Offence under Section 325/34 IPC

Two years' R.I. and a fine of Rs.1,500/-, in default of payment of fine, further undergo one and half months' S.I.

Offence under Section 324/34 IPC

One year's R.I. and a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default of payment of fine, further undergo one month's S.I.

Offence under Section 323/34 IPC

Six months' S.I. and a fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine, further undergo fifteen days' S.I.

Offence under Section 341 IPC

Fifteen days' S.I.

2. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

3. Brief facts of the case are that on 11.07.1996, complainant Deoji Bheel submitted an oral report to police officials of P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top