Back
MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Govind Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Manoj Kumar Garg, J.
1. Instant revision petition under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners challenging the judgment dated 31.08.2013 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Hanumangarh (hereinafter referred to as 'the appellate court') in Criminal Appeal No. 47/2012 by which the appellate court dismissed the appeal of the petitioners and upheld the judgment dated 01.08.2005 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Tibbi (hereinafter referred to as 'the trial court') in Criminal Case No. 183/2000, whereby, the learned trial court convicted and sentenced the present petitioners as under:
| S. No. | Offence | Sentence | Fine | Sentence in default of fine |
| 1. | 148 IPC | 1 year RI | Rs. 1,000/- | 1 month SI |
| 2. | 447 IPC | 3 months RI | - | - |
| 3. | 323/149 IPC | 6 months RI | - | - |
| 4. | 326/149 IPC | 3 years RI | Rs. 2,000/- | 2 months SI |
2. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
3. Brief facts of the case are that on 24.04.2000, complainant/injured Devsingh gave a parcha bayan at Government hospital to the Police Personnel of PS Tibbi to the effect that the accused persons came armed with deadly weapo
The court may reduce a sentence to the time already served when considering the circumstances of the case and the mental trauma endured during protracted trials.
The court may reduce a sentence based on the time already served and the circumstances surrounding the case, even when the conviction is upheld.
The court has the discretion to consider the time already undergone and the mental agony of protracted trial in reducing the sentence of the accused.
The court upheld the conviction of the accused while reducing the sentence for two petitioners to the period already served, affirming the adequacy of the original sentences.
The court may reduce a sentence to the period already served, considering the duration of incarceration and the circumstances surrounding the case.
The court can reduce the sentence to the period already served, considering the time spent in custody and the mental trauma of a protracted trial.
The court can reduce a sentence under Section 498A IPC to the time already served when considering the circumstances of the case, including compromise and duration of trial.
The court may reduce a sentence to the period already served, considering the time spent in incarceration and the circumstances of the case.
The court upheld the conviction under Section 379 IPC but reduced the sentence to the period already served, considering the time spent in custody and the circumstances of the case.
The court established that in cases of prolonged trials, the time served and the mental impact on the accused should be significant factors in determining the appropriateness of the sentence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
