Back
MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Rohit – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Instant criminal revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 17.11.2023 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Nagaur in Sessions Case No. 71/2022 whereby, the trial court has framed charges against the petitioner for offences under Section 304B & 498A IPC.
2. Brief facts of the case are that on 27.08.2020, respondent complainant submitted a written report before the SHO, P.S. Khinvsar, District Nagaur to the effect that marriage of his sister Kiran was solemnized with Rohit as per Hindu rites on 29.01.2020. At the time of marriage, sufficient dowry was given to the family members of the groom but they were not contended with the dowry and therefore, started harassing his sister demanding more dowry. It was stated that 11.08.2020, she was turned out from her matrimonial home when she was 4-5 months pregnant. On account of the harassment, his sister committed suicide by hanging on 27.08.2020.
3. On this report, the police started investigation and after due investigation, the police filed challan against the present petitioner for offence under Sections 304B, 498A IPC. Thereafter, the case was committed before the learned Additi
The court upheld the framing of charges under IPC Sections 304B and 498A, emphasizing the necessity of establishing essential ingredients for dowry death and the standard of suspicion at the charge f....
trial court while considering the discharge application is not to act as a mere post office. It can evaluate the evidence for a limited purpose to find out whether there are sufficient grounds to try....
At the charge framing stage, continuous demand for dowry and the existence of cruelty must be demonstrated, allowing for the presumption of guilt under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC.
The court upheld the presumption of abetment of suicide under Section 113-A of the Evidence Act, affirming sufficient grounds for framing charges of cruelty and abetment against the petitioners.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to establish cruelty or harassment for dowry and the presumption of abetment of suicide against the accused in cases of dowry death.
The main legal point established is that at the stage of framing charges, the trial court is only required to consider whether uncontroverted allegations prima facie make out a case against the accus....
The prosecution must prove the necessary ingredients for dowry death under Section 304-B IPC, including evidence of cruelty or harassment related to dowry demand, to justify altering charges.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of statutory law and principles for exercising power under Cr.P.C. in determining the framing of charges under Section 306 of IPC, ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
