Shobha Lal Regar vs State of Rajasthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2219

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Shobha Lal Regar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Pradeep Kumar Shah, Sonal Suryavanshi
For the Respondents: Vikram Sharma, Rajesh Parihar

ORDER :

1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the FIR No. 22/2023 registered at Police Station Deogarh, District Rajsamand for the offence under Sections 353 & 504 of IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both the accused and complainant are employees at Municipal Board, Deogarh. A totally false FIR has been registered against the petitioner by the complainant. Counsel further submits that no such type of occurrence has taken place between the petitioner and complainant and no act has been done by the petitioner. Thus, the complainant only with a view to harass and pressurise the petitioner, filed the present FIR. Therefore, it is prayed that the FIR may be quashed.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the prayer made by the petitioner.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and carefully gone through the case diary.

5. From the perusal of case diary, it is evident that according to the statements of complainant-Krishna Gopal, Executive Officer of Municipal Board, Deogarh as well as independent witnesses Manoj Kumar, Hari Singh, Babu Singh and Manish Singh