Rajasthan High Court
Dave, C.J. & Lodha, J.
The Jaipur Udbyog Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondents
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 147 of 1968
Decided On : December 12, 1968
2. The petitioner is a Limited Company. It is carrying on business in the manufacture of cement and has a factory at Sawai Madhopur in the State of Rajasthan.
3. In exercise of the powers conferred by secs. 18-G and 25 of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act. 65 of 1951 (which will hereinafter be called the Act) and other powers enabling it in that behalf the Central Government made the Cement Control Order 1967. (which will hereinafter be called "the Order"). Sec. 18-G of the Act, which deals with the powers of the Central Government to control supply, distribution, price etc. of certain articles, reads as follows :
"18G. (1) The Central Government, so far as it appears it to be necessary or expedient for securing the equitable distribution and availability at fair prices of any article or class of articles relatable to any scheduled industry, may, notwithstanding any thing contained in any other provision of this Act, by notified order, provide for regulating the supply and distribution thereof and trade and commerce therein.
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the powers conferred by sub-sec. (1) a notified order made thereunder may provide :
(a) for controlling the prices at which any such article or class thereof may be
brought or sold;
(b) for regulating any licenses, permits or otherwise the distribution, transport, disposal, acquisition, possession, use or consumption of any such article or class thereof;
(c) for prohibiting the withholding from sale of any such article or class thereof
ordinarily kept for sale;
(d) for requiring any person manufacturing producing or holding in stock any such article or class thereof to sell the whole or part of the articles so manufactured or produced during a specified period or to sell the whole or part of the articles so held in stock to such person or class of persons and in such circumstances as may be specified in the order;
(e) for regulating or prohibiting any class or commercial or financial transactions relating to such articles or class thereof which in the opinion of the authority making the order are, or if unregulated are likely to be, detrimental to public interest;
(f) for requiring persons engaged in the distribution and trade and commerce in any such article or class thereof to mark the articles exposed or intended for sale with the sale price or to exhibit at some easily accessible place on the premises the price-lists of articles held for sale and also to similarly exhibit on the first day of every month, or at such other time as may be prescribed, a statement of the total quantities of any such articles in stock;
(g) for collecting any information or statistics with a view to regulating or prohibiting any of the aforesaid matters; and
(h) for any incidental or supplementary matters, including, in-particular, the grant or issue of licenses, permits or other documents and the charging of fees therefor.
(3) Whereas, in pursuance of any order made with reference to clause (d) of sub-sec. (2), any person, sells any article, there shall be paid to him the price therefor :
(a) where the price can consistently with the controlled price, if any, be fixed by agreement, the price so agreed upon;
(b) where no such agreement can be reached, the price calculated with reference to the controlled price, if any, fixed under this section;
(c) where neither clause (a) nor clause (b) applies; the price calculated at the
market rate prevailing in the locality at the date of sale.
(4) No order made in exercise of any power conferred by this section shall be called in question in any court.
(5) Where an order purports to have been made and signed by an authority in exercise of any power conferred by this section, a Court shall, within the meaning of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, presume that such order was so made by that
(1) Bhagwati Saran vs. The State of U. P. (AIR 1961 SC 928)
(2) M/s. Diwan Sugar & General Mills (Pvt.) Ltd. vs. Union of India (AIR 1959 SC 626)
(4) State of Rajasthan vs. Nathmal (AIR 1954 SC 307)
(5) Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Co Ltd. vs. State of Bombay (AIR 1958 SC 328)
(7) British L S. N. C. Ltd. vs. Jasjit Singh (AIR 1964 SC 1451)
(10) Electricity Board Rajasthan vs. Mohan Lal (AIR 1967 SC 1857)
(11) The Lord Krishna Sugar Mills Ltd. vs. The Union of India (AIR 1959 SC 1124)
(3) Chintamanrao vs. The State of M. P. (AIR 1951 SC. 118)
(8) Tata Engineering Co. Ltd. vs. State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. AIR 1964 SC. 40
(12) State of Madras vs. V. G. Row (AIR 1952 S.C. 196-200)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.