BHARGAVA, MODI, BHANDARI
Harakchand – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. Sec. 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure runs as follows:
"115. The High Court may call for the record of any case which has been decided by any Court subordinate to such High Court and in which no appeal lies thereto, and if such subordinate Court appears—
(a) to have exercised a jurisdiction not vested in it by law, or
(b) to have failed to exercise a juris
(18) Shah Prabhudas Ishwardas vs. Shah Bhogilal Nathalal (AIR 1968 Guj. 236)
(2) Major S.S. Khanna vs. Brig. F.J. Dhillon (AIR 1964 SC 497)
(10) Keshardeo Chamria vs. Radha Kishan Chamria (AIR 1953 SC 23)
(11) Manindra Land & Building Corporation Ltd. vs. Bhutnath Banerjee (AIR 1964 SC 1336)
(12) Pandurang Dhondi Chougule vs. Maruti Hari Jadhav (AIR 1966 SC 153)
(13) Sunderlal Paramsukhdas (AIR 1968 SC 360)
(14) Prem Raj vs. D.L.F. Housing & Construction (Pvt.) Ltd. (AIR 1968 SC 1355)
(5) Joy Chand Lal Babu vs. Kamalaksha Chaudhary (AIR 1949 P.C. 239)
(7) N.S. Venkatagiri Ayyangar vs. Hindu Religious Endorsements Board (AIR 1949 P.C. 156)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.