SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Raj) 45

S.K.M.LODHA
Hajari Ram – Appellant
Versus
Mantri, Khadi Mandir, Bikaner – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.R. Mehta, for petitioner; Parmatma Sharan, for non-petitioner

S.K. MAL LODHA, J.—These are two connected revisions and as they have been heard together, it will be convenient to dispose them of by a common judgment.

2. The petitioner submitted an application under Sec. 15(2) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (No. IV of 1936) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) before the Authority under the Act (for short the Authority hereafter) at Bikaner, on July 21, 1972 against the non-petitioner. The petitioner and the non-petitioner will hereafter be referred to as the employee and the employer respectively. It was stated in the application by the employee that the employer had not paid wages from August 23, 1970 to May 31, 1972 @ Rs. 200/- per month. The total amount of wages payable to the employee on account of the aforesaid period was assessed at Rs. 4253.34 p. Along with this application, a separate application for condoning delay was submitted as the claim for wages for the period from August, 1970 to June 30, 1971 was not within the period prescribed by proviso to Section 15(2) of the Act. The facts, which constituted sufficient cause for not making the application within the prescribed period were mentioned in that application. The Authority is










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top