SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Raj) 318

B.S.CHAUHAN
Thomas Chandy – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan Financial Corporation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Manish Singhvi, for Petitioner R.P. Dave, for Respondents

Honble CHAUHAN, J.–The instant writ petition has been filed for issuing a direction to the respondents to treat petitioner as having been appointed in substantive capacity with effect from 16.5.83 or in the alternative to consider him for regularisation w.e.f. 16.5.83 and give him seniority and other consequential benefits accordingly.

(2). The factual gamut reveals that petitioner started working with the respondent Corporation as a Typist on daily wages from 1980. On 14.5.83, a test of Typists was held and his name appeared in the Select List and in pursuance of that he was issued appointment letter 16.5.83 (Annexure 4) which reads as under :–

``The following persons working on stipendary basis in the Corpora- tion are hereby appointed on the post of Typist in the pay scale.......with usual allowances on temporary basis till further orders. The services of these persons will be governed by the Rajasthan Financial Corporation (Staff) Regulation, 1958 and annual grade increments to these persons would be available only after qualifying in Stenography or passing a Graduate Examination.......

(1) Shri Thomas Chandy, (2) Shri Sant Kumar Sharma, (3) Shri Rakesh Kumar.

(3). Petitioner urged















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top