Honble PANWAR, J.–The aforesaid writ petition and 75 other the bunch of writ petitions shown in Schedule-A annexed to this order, involve common questions of law and facts and, therefore, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, they are being heard and decided together.

(2). In SBCWP Nos. 1817/2997, 1819/2007, 1820/2007, 1911/2007, 2114/2007, 2864/2007, 2388/2007, 1899/2007 and 2635/2007, the validity of proviso 2nd to rule 266 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Raj Rules, 1996 (for short, "the Rules of 1996" hereinafter) has been challenged and in the remaining writ petitions as shown in Schedule-A annexed to this order, the corrigendum Annx.2 dated 30-11-2006, to the extent of imposing the condition to produce B.Ed., BSTC Degrees by the applicant/candidate on the date of declaration of the result of competitive examination for the post of Teacher Grade III in primary/upper primary schools, has been challenged. All the writ petitions are being decided by this common order taking the facts of SBCWP No.1817/2007 as the leading case.

(3). Respondent Rajasthan Public Service Commission (for short, "RPSC" hereinafter) issued an advertisement Annx.l dated 30-10- 2006 inviting applica

Click Here to Read the rest of this document