R.S.CHAUHAN
Ganpat – Appellant
Versus
Mangla Ram – Respondent
Hon'ble CHAUHAN, J.—The petitioners have challenged the order dated 06.01.1975 passed by the Revenue Appellate Authority ('the RAA' for short), and two orders passed by the Board of Revenue, namely order dated 20.04.1979 and 31.08.1979.
2. The writ petition was filed by the petitioners against Mangla Ram and others in the year 1981. However, during the pendency of the writ petition, Mangla Ram, the respondent No.1, expired in 1983. Despite his death, no application was moved by the petitioners for bringing his legal representatives on record till 07.09.1988. The respondents raised an objection that the application for bringing the legal representatives was inordinately delayed by five years. And yet, no application for condonation of delay had been filed along with the application for bringing the legal representatives on record. Therefore, on 16.05.1996 i.e. after eight years of having filed the application for brining the legal representatives on record, an application for condonation of delay was filed by the petitioners. After hearing both the parties, vide judgment dated 24.07.1997, the learned Single Judge dismissed the application and held that the writ petition has a
Ram Sumiran & Ors. vs. D.D.C. & Ors. (AIR 1985 SC 606) 5
Puran Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Ors. ((1996) 2 SCC 205) 6
K. Rudrappa vs. Shivappa (AIR 2004 SC 4346) 15
Hemraj vs. Income-Tax Recovery Officer, Jodhpur
State of Gujarat vs. Patel Raghav & Ors. (AIR 1969 SC 1297) 21
Mansaram vs. S.P. Pathak & Ors. (AIR 1983 SC 1239) 21
Khoday Distilleries Limited vs. Scotch Whisky Association & Ors. ((2008) 10 SCC 723) 21
Anandi Lal vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (1995(1) RLR 555) 21
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.