SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 9

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
GERIDEVI @ GUTKI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 1410 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Vineet Jain, Sr. Adv., Mr. Sanjay Bishnoi, Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP, Mr. Pradeep Choudhary for Complainant

The court ruled that lack of evidence for intent to instigate suicide justifies granting bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Bail application - The petitioner, arrested in connection with an FIR for the offence under Section 108 BNS, sought bail following the suicide of her husband, Bansilal, who left a note attributing his actions to the petitioner's behavior - The court found no evidence of intention to instigate suicide, allowing bail on the condition of a personal bond and sureties. (Paras 1-7)

(B) Bail - The court emphasized that the observations made are solely for the purpose of the bail application and should not influence the trial court's judgment. (Para 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, wife of the deceased, was accused of causing his suicide through harassment, as indicated in a suicide note. The court reviewed the circumstances and evidence presented.

Findings of Court:
There was no evidence of mens rea or intention from the petitioner to instigate the suicide, leading to the decision to grant bail.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner had the intention to instigate the deceased to commit suicide based on the evidence presented.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that while there was prima facie evidence of misbehavior, there was no evidence of intention to instigate the suicide, warranting bail.

Result: Bail application allowed.

ORDER :

KULDEEP MATHUR, J.

1. This application for bail under Section 483 BNSS (439 Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.252/2024 registered at Police Station Osian, District Jodhpur Rural for the offence under Section 108 BNS.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as per the prosecution, the deceased- Bansilal on 16.09.2024, committed suicide by hanging himself. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner who is wife of the deceased has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel submitted that as per the prosecution, the deceased has left a hand written suicide note indicating that due to the bad behaviour of the petitioner, he felt harassed/insulted/humiliated and was left with no option but to end his life.

3. Learned counsel submitted that the hand written suicide note of the deceased cannot be treated as the gospel truth. It was urged that even it is assumed that the deceased was harassed by the present petitioner and he had taken the abusive treatment/behaviour of the petitioner seriously, then also, he had enough time to ponder and reflect over it, therefore, it cannot be said that only the aforesaid behaviour of the petitioner drove the deceased to commit suicide. On these grounds, learned counsel implored the Court to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties at Bar. Perused the material available on record.

6. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, this Court prima facie finds that there is a possibility of petitioner misbehaving and using abusive language against the deceased but there is no evidence available on record suggesting that the petitioner had any mens rea or intention to aid or instigate the deceased to commit suicide. Thus, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. (483 BNSS) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Geridevi @ Gutki W/o Bansilal arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.252/2024 registered at Police Station Osian, District Jodhpur Rural shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided she furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for her appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.

8. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top