SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 645

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
HARKHA RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Zeeshan Ali, Mr. Aslam Khan, Mr. Shrawan Singh, PP

ORDER :

KULDEEP MATHUR, J.

This application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS (439 Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.114/2024 registered at Police Station Sankda, District Jaisalmer, for offences under Sections 498A and 323 IPC and Sections 110, 123 and 49 of BNS.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the co-accused Sugani @ Sugana (S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.14661/2024) has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 06.12.2024. Learned counsel submitted that the case of the present petitioner is not worse than the case of above named co-accused who has already been enlarged on bail.

3. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody; challan has already been filed and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. However, he was not in a position to refute the fact that co-accused Sugani @ Sugana has already been enlarged on bail.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top