SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 649

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
ROOP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Naresh Singh, Mr. Shrawan Singh, PP

ORDER :

KULDEEP MATHUR, J.

This application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS (439 Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.425/2024 registered at Police Station Gogunda, District Udaipur, for offence under Section 108 of BNS.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the co-accused Vidhya Bai (S. B. Cr. Misc.Bail Application No.243/2025) has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 28.01.2025. Learned counsel submitted that the co-accused of the present petitioner is not worse than the above named co-accused person who has already been enlarged on bail.

3. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody; challan has already been filed and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. However, he was not in a position to refute the fact that the co-accused Vidhya Devi has already been enlarged on bail.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

6. The order

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top