SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 63

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
YUSUF KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLR / 275 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Sanjay Mathur with Mr. Vibhor Sharma, Mr. Kuldeep Singh Kumpawat, Asst. to Mr. Deepak Choudhary, AAG

The court may suspend a sentence if justified by the circumstances of the case, particularly when the appeal process is expected to be lengthy.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 438 - Suspension of sentence - Application for suspension of sentence was allowed based on the petitioner's argument that the trial was lengthy and he was previously on bail - The court found it fit to suspend the substantive sentence awarded to the petitioner. (Paras 3 and 4)

(B) Conditions of bail - The court imposed conditions for the petitioner’s release, including the deposit of 50% of the fine amount and a personal bond, ensuring the petitioner’s appearance for trial and notifying changes of address. (Paras 4 and 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate and sought suspension of the sentence pending appeal, arguing the prolonged duration of the legal process.

Findings of Court:
The court deemed it appropriate to suspend the sentence under the conditions mentioned, allowing the petitioner to remain free while awaiting the outcome of the revision.

Issues: The main issue addressed was whether the sentence should be suspended given the circumstances of the case and the petitioner's previous bail status.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the length of time for the appeal justified the suspension of the sentence, provided the petitioner complied with specific conditions to ensure accountability.

Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.

ORDER :

MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.

1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Asst. to Addl. Advocate General on application for suspension of sentence No.67/2025.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was on bail during the trial and hearing of the revision will take sufficient long time, therefore, the sentence of the petitioner may kindly be suspended.

3. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of the petitioner and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the substantive sentence awarded to the accused petitioner.

4. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 438 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the substantive sentences passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Deedwana in Criminal Original Case No.40/1988 vide order dated 05.10.2017 as affirmed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge Deedwana vide order dated 13.02.2025 in Criminal Appeal No.50/2017 against the petitioner-applicant Yusuf Khan S/o Shri Peeru Khan shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid revision subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit 50% of the fine amount as imposed by the learned trial Court and he shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 09.04.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

4. Petitioner shall deposit 50% of the fine amount as imposed by the learned trial court.

5. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top