SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 1139

Advocates:
Mr. Anuj Sahlot, Mr. Deepak Choudhary, GA cum AAG, Mr. Kuldeep Singh Kumpawat

Suspension of sentence granted due to prior bail status and expected duration of revision petition, subject to conditions for appearance.

Headnote:

(A) Criminal Procedure Code - Sections 438 and 442 - Application for suspension of sentence - The court found it appropriate to suspend the substantive sentence awarded to the accused petitioner(s) due to their prior bail status during trial and the anticipated duration of the revision petition - The court ordered the suspension of the sentence subject to conditions including the deposit of 50% of the fine amount and execution of a personal bond. (Paras 1-4)

(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - The court imposed specific conditions for the accused-petitioner(s) to ensure their appearance before the trial court during the pendency of the revision petition. (Paras 5-8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner(s) was on bail during the trial, and the revision petition is expected to take time, leading to the decision to suspend the sentence. The original conviction was by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, which was affirmed by the Additional Session Judge.

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the application for suspension of sentence, emphasizing the necessity of conditions to ensure the accused's appearance in court.

Issues: The main issue was whether the substantive sentence should be suspended given the circumstances of the case and the prior bail status of the petitioner(s).

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the suspension of the sentence was justified due to the petitioner's prior bail status and the expected duration of the revision petition, highlighting the importance of ensuring the accused's compliance with court appearances.

Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.

ORDER :

MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.

1. Heard.

2. Admit. Issue notice.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of respondent – State.

4. Heard on application for suspension of sentence No.48/2025. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced by the petitioner(s) and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the fact that the petitioner(s) was on bail during the trial and hearing of the revision petition is likely to take time, therefore, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the substantive sentence awarded to the accused petitioner(s).

5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 438 R/w 442 of BNSS (Old Section 397 R/w 401 Cr.P.C.) is allowed and it is ordered that the substantive sentences passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nathdwara, District Rajsamand vide judgment dated 15.07.2013 in Original Criminal Case No.200/2008 as affirmed by learned Additional Session Judge, Nathdwara, District Rajsamand vide order dated 27.01.2025 in Criminal Appeal No.32/2013 against the accused-petitioner(s) – Azad Khan S/o Shri Sher Singh shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid revision subject to the condition that the petitioner(s) shall deposit 50% of the fine amount as imposed by the learned trial Court and he/she/they shall be released on bail, provided he/she/they executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his/her/their appearance in this court on 25.03.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the revision on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the revision is decided.

2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

4. Petitioner(s) shall deposit 50% of fine amount as imposed by the learned trial court.

6. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-petitioner(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-petitioner(s) was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused petitioner(s) does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top