SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 762

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
SUNIL SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLR / 207 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Ramesh Purohit, Mr. Deepak Choudhary, AAG, Mr. KS Kumpawat

Suspension of sentence is warranted when petitioners are on bail during trial and there is no immediate hearing for the appeal.

Headnote:(A) Section 438(1) of the BNSS - Suspension of sentence - Application for suspension of sentence allowed due to the petitioners being on bail during trial and the absence of immediate hearing prospects for the appeal - Substantive sentences awarded by the trial court shall remain suspended pending final disposal of the revision - Petitioners required to deposit 50% of the fine and execute a personal bond for appearance. (Paras 4-5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, Sunil Sharma and Renu Sharma, were convicted in Regular Criminal Case No.17438/2015 and sought suspension of their sentences during the appeal process, with considerations given to their prior bail status and the timeline for appeal hearings.

Findings of Court:
The court found it appropriate to suspend the sentences and set conditions for the petitioners' release, including the deposit of a fine and requirements for regular appearance before the trial court.

Issues: The main issue addressed was whether the substantive sentences should be suspended pending the appeal's final resolution.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the circumstances warranted suspension of the sentences, emphasizing the petitioners' bail status and the delayed timeline for the appeal process.

Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.

ORDER :

MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.

Heard.

2. Admit. Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State.

3. Heard on application for suspension of sentence.

4. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of the petitioners and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the facts that the petitioners were on bail during the trial and there is no chance of hearing of the appeal in near future, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the substantive sentence awarded to the accused petitioners.

5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 438(1) of BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the substantive sentences passed by the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, No.2, Bhilwara, in Regular Criminal Case No.17438/2015 vide order dated 08.07.2024 as affirmed by the Learned Addl. Sessions Judge No.2, Bhilwara, vide order dated 05.02.2025 in Cr. Appeal No.161/2024 against the petitioners- applicants (1) Sunil Sharma S/o Shri Naresh Chandra Sharma & (2) Smt. Renu Sharma W/o Sunil Sharma, shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid revision and they shall be released on bail subject to deposit of 50% of the fine amount as imposed by the learned trial Court, provided they execute a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each of to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance in this court on 26.03.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the revision on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the revision is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

4. Petitioners shall deposit 50% of the fine amount as imposed by the learned trial Court.

6. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top