SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 81

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH, MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR, JJ
Sharukh Khan Son of Abeeb Khan @ Habeen Khan - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
SOSA / 2355 / 2024
Decided On : 07-03-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Surendra Singh Sunda, Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG, Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, Addl.G.A., Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG, Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Mr. Khushwant, for the complainant

Suspension of sentence is justified when the accused shows circumstances such as prior bail status, marriage to the prosecutrix, and delays in FIR filing, indicating a potential for prolonged appeal.

Headnote:

(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 376(2)(n) - Suspension of sentence application filed by accused-applicant sentenced to life imprisonment for rape - Accused-applicant claims false implication and marriage with prosecutrix, who lodged FIR after 9 days - Court considers delay in FIR, marriage, and pending divorce petition - Sentence suspended during appeal. (Paras 2, 3, 6, 7)

(B) Bail - The court may suspend sentence if justified by circumstances, including the accused being on bail during trial and the likelihood of prolonged appeal proceedings. (Paras 6, 7)

Facts of the case:
The accused-applicant was sentenced to life imprisonment for rape. He claims false implication and that he married the prosecutrix, who filed an FIR after 9 days. A divorce petition is pending.

Findings of Court:
The court found it just to suspend the sentence considering the accused's bail status during trial, the marriage, and the delay in filing the FIR.

Issues: The main issue was whether the sentence should be suspended given the circumstances of the case and the delay in lodging the FIR.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that suspension of sentence is warranted when circumstances indicate that the accused may not pose a risk and the appeal may take considerable time.

Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.

ORDER :

1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the present accused-applicant along with the appeal.

2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the offence under Section 376 (2) (n) of the Indian Penal Code , 1860.

3. Counsel for the accused-applicant has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that accused-applicant was on bail during trial and presently, he is confined in Jail. He further submits that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter. He further submits that the prosecutrix is a lady aged about 21 years and the FIR in this matter has been lodged after a delay of 9 days. He further submits that the accused-applicant and the prosecutrix have solemnized the marriage and thereafter the prosecutrix has also filed a divorce petition in the Family Court, at New Delhi Ex.(P- 22). He further submits that the hearing/disposal of appeal is likely to take long time. Therefore, he prayed that sentence awarded to the accused-applicant may be suspended and the accused-applicant be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal.

4. Learned Additional Government Advocate assisted by learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the present application for suspension of sentence.

5. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and also considering the facts; that the accused-applicant was on bail during trial; that the accused-applicant and the prosecutrix have solemnized the marriage; that the FIR has been lodged after a delay of 9 days; that the divorce petition is pending before the Family Court, at New Delhi and also considering the fact that hearing/disposal of appeal is likely to take long time, we deem it just and proper to suspend the sentence of the present accused-applicant during the pendency of the appeal.

7. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the accused-applicant shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the accused-applicant be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that the accused-applicant shall appear before this Court on 15.04.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top