SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 531

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH, MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL, JJ
MANOHARI S/O GHAMMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
SOSA / 2374 / 2024



Advocates:
Mr. Deepak Khandelwal, Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Mr. Naman Yadav, Mr. Chinmay Sharma, Mr. Saurabh Yadav, Mr. Harshit Bhatt, Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-Cum-AAG with Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.GA, Mr. Aman Kumar, Mr. M. K. Kaushik for Complainant.

Suspension of sentence is justified when accused are on bail during trial, and cases involve complexities requiring prolonged appeal processes.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302/149 - Suspension of sentence applications filed by applicants sentenced to life imprisonment - Applicants claimed false implication in a free fight incident, with cross FIRs lodged - Contradictions noted in medical testimonies and ongoing land dispute pending in Revenue Courts - Court deemed it just to suspend sentence during appeal pending - (Paras 2, 5, 6)

(B) Bail - Principles governing suspension of sentence - When the accused were on bail during trial, and considering the lengthy appeal process, suspension of sentence is warranted to ensure justice. (Paras 5, 6)

Facts of the case:
The applicants were sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 302/149 of IPC. They claimed false implication, citing a free fight and contradictions in medical testimonies. Both parties involved were from the same family, and a land dispute was pending in Revenue Courts.

Findings of Court:
The court found it just to allow the suspension of the sentence, considering the nature of the case and the fact that the applicants were on bail during the trial.

Issues: The main issues included whether the applicants were falsely implicated and the justifiability of suspending the sentence during the appeal process.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that given the circumstances of a free fight, contradictions in evidence, and the ongoing land dispute, it was appropriate to suspend the sentence during the appeal process to ensure fairness.

Result: Suspension of sentence applications allowed.

Order :

1. These suspension of sentence applications have been filed by the applicants along with the appeals.

2. Counsel for the applicants has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that during the trial, the applicants were on bail and the sentence of life imprisonment has been awarded to the applicants under Section 302/149 of IPC and they are in judicial custody at District Jail, Dausa. He further submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in these matters. He further submits that both the cases are of free fight and from both the sides the cross FIR was lodged in the Police Station against each other. He further submits that there are contradictions between the statements of Doctors who examined the injured persons as well as deceased and Doctor who conducted the post-martem and in both the appeals, applicants in main case as well as in cross case belong to the same family and dispute with regard to land is pending in the Revenue Courts and hearing of appeals may take long time and prayed that sentence awarded to the applicants may be suspended and they be released on bail during the pendency of the appeals.

3. Learned Government Advocate and counsel for the complainant have opposed the suspension of sentence applications.

4. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

5. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and also considering the fact that both the cases are of free fight and all the accused applicants were on bail during trial and the hearing of appeals may take long time, We deem it just and proper to allow these criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence applications.

6. In that view of the matter, these criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence applications are allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the applicants shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeals and the applicants be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before this Court on 17.03.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance.

8. A copy of this order be placed in connected file.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top