HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH, MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL, JJ
MANOHARI S/O GHAMMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
SOSA / 2374 / 2024
Order :
1. These suspension of sentence applications have been filed by the applicants along with the appeals.
2. Counsel for the applicants has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that during the trial, the applicants were on bail and the sentence of life imprisonment has been awarded to the applicants under Section 302/149 of IPC and they are in judicial custody at District Jail, Dausa. He further submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in these matters. He further submits that both the cases are of free fight and from both the sides the cross FIR was lodged in the Police Station against each other. He further submits that there are contradictions between the statements of Doctors who examined the injured persons as well as deceased and Doctor who conducted the post-martem and in both the appeals, applicants in main case as well as in cross case belong to the same family and dispute with regard to land is pending in the Revenue Courts and hearing of appeals may take long time and prayed that sentence awarded to the applicants may be suspended and they be released on bail during the pendency of the appeals.
3. Learned Government Advocate and counsel for the complainant have opposed the suspension of sentence applications.
4. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
5. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and also considering the fact that both the cases are of free fight and all the accused applicants were on bail during trial and the hearing of appeals may take long time, We deem it just and proper to allow these criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence applications.
6. In that view of the matter, these criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence applications are allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the applicants shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeals and the applicants be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before this Court on 17.03.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.
7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance.
8. A copy of this order be placed in connected file.
Suspension of sentence is justified when accused are on bail during trial, and cases involve complexities requiring prolonged appeal processes.
The court allowed the suspension of sentence for accused-applicants pending appeal, emphasizing their prior bail status and involvement of a co-accused.
The court can suspend a sentence during the appeal process if justified by circumstances such as the duration of custody and similar cases.
Suspension of sentence granted based on the nature of allegations and circumstances of a free fight, allowing accused-applicants to appeal while on bail.
The court allows suspension of sentence for a juvenile convicted under Section 302 IPC, emphasizing the reliance on circumstantial evidence and the lengthy appeal process.
The court may suspend a sentence pending appeal if circumstances warrant, particularly considering the delay in hearing the appeal and the accused's custody status.
Suspension of sentence justified due to delays in appeal process and circumstances surrounding eyewitness testimonies.
Suspension of sentence is justified when the accused shows circumstances such as prior bail status, marriage to the prosecutrix, and delays in FIR filing, indicating a potential for prolonged appeal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.