SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 85

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
Gokla – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. B.S. Rathore, Mr. Deepak Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG, Mr. K.S. Kumpawat, AAAG

ORDER :

MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.

1. Learned Public Prosecutor submits a report in which it has been mentioned that petitioner No.1-Gokla S/o Dana Ji expired. The said report is hereby taken on record.

2. Hence, the criminal revision petition in respect of petitioner No.1-Gokla S/o Dana Ji is dismissed as abated.

3. So far as Petitioner No.2 is concerned, by way of filing the instant criminal revision petition, a challenge has been made to the order dated 05.08.2006 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Aburoad, District Sirohi in Criminal Appeal No.11/2005 whereby the learned appellate Court dismissed the appeal filed against the judgment of conviction dated 21.07.2005 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class Pindwara, District Sirohi in Criminal Regular Case No.193/2001 by which the learned trial Judge convicted and sentenced the petitioners as under:-

OffenceSentence
Section 332 IPCTwo years’SI
Section 353 IPCOne years’ SI

4. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently and the period spent in judicial custody shall be adjusted in the original imprisonment.

5. The gist of the prosecution story is that on 08.04.2001, complainant – Hem Singh submitted a written report to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top