Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
Aas Mohammed @ Asu S/O Shri Aladin – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Order
1- izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr vkl ekSgEen mQZ vklw iq= vyknhu dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g r`rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk] 2023 dh /kkjk 483 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk&lnj vyoj] ftyk&vyoj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&592@2023 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 143] 323] 341] 302 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ¼ckn vuqla/kku 147] 149] 341] 323] 324 o 302 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk½ esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr izFke tekur izkFkZuk&i= la[;k&S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8169/2024, U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 24-07-2024 dks [kkfjt fd;k x;k Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk&i= la[;k&S.B.Criminal Miscellaneous IInd Bail Application No. 15269/2024, bl U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 13-01-2025 dks fujLr fd;k x;k FkkA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk&i= [kkfjt djrs le; fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks fpfdRldh; lk{khx.k ds c;ku izkFkfedrk ls ys[kc) djok;s tkus ds funsZ'k fn;k x;k FkkA fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k e`rd dh iksLVekVZe fjiksVZ djus okys fpfdRld ih-MCY;w&9 MkWDVj ;ksxs'k pkS/kjh o ih-MCY;w&10 MkWDVj ds-ds- eh.kk ds c;ku ys[kc) fd;s tk pqds gSaA mDr fpfdRldh; lk{khx.k dk c;ku ys[kc) fd;s tkus ds mijkar izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g r`rh; t
The court established that serious charges require substantial evidence for bail consideration, emphasizing the need for careful judicial scrutiny in such matters.
Judicial actions must comply with statutory requirements to ensure validity and enforceability.
Administrative actions must strictly adhere to statutory provisions and fall within the lawful authority granted to the administrative body.
The court emphasized the necessity of strict adherence to procedural timelines in legal orders to maintain the integrity of judicial processes.
Procedural fairness is essential in legal proceedings, and failure to adhere to established procedures can impact the outcome of a case.
The court affirmed the legality of administrative actions taken under statutory provisions, emphasizing adherence to established laws.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of sections 120, 131Mh, and 132 of the Act.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory requirement for hospitals to provide immediate medical treatment to victims of specified offenses and the potential punishment for....
The court mandates timely scheduling of medical procedures, emphasizing administrative obligations to ensure patient welfare.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
