SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 102

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR, J
PRAHLAD SINGH S/O BHAGWAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Rajveer Singh Jhala, Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP

Order :

1- izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk dh /kkjk 483 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk&duokl] ftyk& dskVk xzkeh.k esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 154@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@15] 8@29 Lokid vkS"kf/k vkSj eu%izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA 

2- izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku~ vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks izdj.k esa >Bwk lac) fd;k x;k gSA izdj.k esa okf.kfT;d ek=k tks eknd inkFkZ MksMk+ pwjk dh cjkenxh gqbZ gS og vU; eq[; vfHk;qDr nhid ls gqbZ gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd ek= vU; lgvfHk;qDrx.k ds iwNrkN uksV ds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 8@15] 8@29 ,uMhih,l ds varxZr >wBk lac) fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr us MksMk pwjk eq[; vfHk;qDr nhid dks miyC/k djk;k gS bl lnaHkZ esa dksbZ lkjHkwr lk{; vfHkys[k ij ugha gSa ek= lgvfHk;qDrx.k dh laLd`fr vius vkiesa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo#) i<+us ;ksX; ugha gSaA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo#) lacaf/kr U;k;ky; ds le{k vfHk;ksx i= izLrqr gks pqdk gSA izdj.k esa vU; lgvfHk;qDrx.k ftuds }kjk nhid ds okgu dks ,DldksVZ djus dk vkjksi Fkk mudh tekur ;kfpdk bl U;k;ky; }kjk mu vfHk;qDrx.k nhid] jkgqy] usikyflag ,oa dhfrZ dqekj dh tekur ;kfpdk,a Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gSaA izkFk

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top