Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT, J
Mohammad Ali Khan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
Order :
YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT, J
01- izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls tekur dk ;g prqFkZ vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ¼439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk½] iqfyl Fkkuk dksrokyh pq:+] ftyk pq: esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 221@2022] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 120ch] 147] 342@149] 302@149 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds ekeys esa tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk izLrqr gqvk gSA
02- fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dkQh le; ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gSA iwoZ esa rhu erZck tekur dk izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt gksus ds mijkUr bl U;k;ky; }kjk ,lch fØfeuy fjfotu fiVh'ku la[;k 1543@2023 eksgEen vyh [kku cuke LVsV vkWQ jktLFkku oxSjg vkns'k fnukad 29-11-2024 ds }kjk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) yxk;s x;s vkjksi vUrxZr /kkjk 147] 342@149] 302@149 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa mUeksfpr fd;k tk pqdk gS vkSj /kkjk 120ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dh gn rd gh vkjksi 'ks"k gS vkSj bl vkns'k dks ekuuh; mPPre U;k;ky; esa pqukSrh ugha nh xbZ gSA bl vk/kkj ij ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ?kVukLFky ij ekStwn ugha Fkk] izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks >wBk Qalk;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr 75 o"khZ; cqtqxZ gSA lg&vfHk;qDr eksgEen jQhd mQZ fQdq dh tekur bl U;k;ky; ds vkn
Judicial actions must comply with statutory requirements to ensure validity and enforceability.
The court affirmed the legality of administrative actions taken under statutory provisions, emphasizing adherence to established laws.
Administrative actions must strictly adhere to statutory provisions and fall within the lawful authority granted to the administrative body.
The court emphasized the necessity of strict adherence to procedural timelines in legal orders to maintain the integrity of judicial processes.
Procedural fairness is essential in legal proceedings, and failure to adhere to established procedures can impact the outcome of a case.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and influence of the legal provisions on the court's decision.
The court established that serious charges require substantial evidence for bail consideration, emphasizing the need for careful judicial scrutiny in such matters.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the provisions of the 160@1998, 302, 304ch, and 498 sections.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of key provisions of the Criminal Law Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
