Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
Dinesh Mehta, J
Navneet Kumar Upadhyay – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Order
1. The matter comes up for consideration of application (I.A.No.01/2020) filed under Article 226(3) of the Constitution of India seeking vacation of the interim relief which has been granted by this Court on 25.02.2020 in light of order passed in the case of Kishan Singh Gurjar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1888/2020.
2. While submitting that the interim order in the instant case has been passed on the basis of interim order passed in the case of Kishan Singh Gurjar (supra), Mr. Parvat Singh Panwar, learned counsel for the applicant – State informed that the said writ petition has been dismissed on 09.10.2023 as having become infructuous.
3. Arguing on the merit of the case, learned counsel stated that the petitioners, when appointed on the post of Lab Technician on urgent temporary basis, did not have registration with the Rajasthan Paramedical Council and therefore, the State refused to extend their contract once the Rajasthan Medical Education Society Jaipur Personnel’s (Recruitment And Other Conditions) Employment Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ‘RAJMES Rules, 2017’) came to be amended by the enactment of Rajasthan Medical Educati
The court affirmed that amendments to employment rules requiring registration are applicable at the time of contract renewal, and prior engagement does not confer automatic rights to renewal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
