SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 292

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
Surendra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
CRLMB / 2854 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Mangi Lal Vishnoi, Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP

In the absence of substantial evidence against the accused and the grant of bail to co-accused, bail should be granted to ensure parity.

Headnote:(A) NDPS Act - Sections 8 and 29 - Bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS (439 of Cr.P.C.) for offences punishable under NDPS Act - Petitioner arrested in connection with recovery of 219 kgs. of contraband - Co-accused already granted bail - No substantial evidence against petitioner - Court inclined to grant bail. (Paras 1, 3, 4, 8)

(B) Grant of Bail - The court considers the principle of parity in granting bail to co-accused when no distinguishing factors are present - Judicial custody and prolonged trial considered for granting bail. (Paras 5, 7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was arrested in connection with an FIR for NDPS offences after a police team recovered contraband from a vehicle. Co-accused had been granted bail, and the petitioner’s involvement was not substantiated by strong evidence.

Findings of Court:
The court found no significant evidence against the petitioner and noted that the co-accused had been granted bail, leading to the decision to grant bail to the petitioner as well.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner should be granted bail given the lack of evidence against him and the fact that co-accused had already been released on bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that in the absence of substantial evidence against the petitioner and considering the bail granted to co-accused, the petitioner is entitled to bail.

Result: Bail application allowed.

Order :

1. This application for bail has been filed under Section 483 BNSS (439 of Cr.P.C.) on behalf of the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.117/2024, registered at Police Station Kotwali Nimbahera, District Chittorgarh, for the offences punishable under Sections 815 and 8/29 of the NDPS Act .

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as per the prosecution, a police team of Police Station, Nimbahera on 07.03.2024, during routine nakabandi of the area falling under the jurisdiction flagged down one Innova Car bearing Registration No.RJ-14-UE-3019. However, the driver of the offending vehicle being co-accused Bhairulal managed to flee from the scene. Upon an interrogation of the co-accused Govind Kumar and upon a search of the offending vehicle, the contraband (Poppy Husk/Straw) weighing 219 kgs. and 200 gms. was recovered. The co-passenger of the offending vehicle, i.e. co-accused Govind Kumar on being asked, could not show any valid license to possess or transport the recovered contraband. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that as per the prosecution, the petitioner alongwith the other co-accused persons namely Surendra S/o Gopilal Rayka and Simrat was escorting the offending vehicle and they were not arrested from the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the co- accused persons namely Surendra and Gagan (S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.11853/2024) have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 16.12.2024. Learned counsel further submitted that the case of the present petitioner is not at all distinguishable from that of the above named co-accused persons who have already been enlarged on bail by this Court. Learned counsel further submitted that the statements of the investigating officer (PW-2) has already been recorded before the competent Criminal Court and the investigating officer during his cross-examination has admitted that apart from the disclosure statement of the co-accused persons, there is nothing on record indicating the involvement of the petitioner in the commission of alleged crime.

5. Lastly, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

6. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. However, he was not in a position to refute the fact that the co-accused persons have already been enlarged no bail by this Court. However, he was also not in a position to refute the fact that the investigating officer during his cross-examination has admitted that apart from the disclosure statements of the co- accused persons, there is nothing on record indicating the involvement of the petitioner in the commission of alleged crime.

7. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

8. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Surendra S/o Gopilal Rayaka shall be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. No.117/2024, registered at Police Station Kotwali Nimbahera, District Chittorgarh, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

9. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top