SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 296

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
Mr. Justice Farjand Ali, J
Rajesh Modi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. B.R Chahar, Mr. Surendra Bishnoi, AGA, Mr. Vikas Godara

Order :

Farjand Ali, J

1. The instant criminal misc. Petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS for quashing the entire proceedings arose out of FIR No.164/2010 registered at Police Station Hanumangarh Junction, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan for the offences under Sections 420, 120-B, 419, 467 , 468 & 471 of IPC .

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the dispute in between the parties has been resolved through an amicable settlement and now, there remains no controversy in between them and the parties do not wish to continue the criminal proceedings further.

3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for complainant-respondent admits the fact of compromise and submits that he is willing if the FIR and the proceedings are quashed on the basis of compromise entered in between the parties.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the petition.

5. Heard, perused the material available on record more particularly the police report, nature of allegation and the compromise deed executed in between the parties. The parties to the lis have resolved their dispute amicably and do not wish to continue the criminal proceedings and have jointly prayed for quashing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top