SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 228

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI, J
Tansukh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Dinesh Kumar Godara, Mr. Vikram Rajpurohit, DyGA, Mr. Ram Prakash Dudy

Order :

1. The instant criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS for quashing of FIR No.273/2024 registered at the Police Station Kotwali, District Nagaur for the offences under Sections 341, 336, 308 and 34 of the IPC.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the dispute in between the parties has been resolved through an amicable settlement and now, there remains no controversy in between them and the parties do not wish to continue the criminal proceedings further. A copy of the compromise deed executed between the parties has been placed on the record.

3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for complainant-respondent admits the fact of compromise and submits that he is willing if the FIR and the proceedings are quashed on the basis of compromise entered in between the parties. He submits that in a fit of anger an exaggerated version of the incident was narrated in the FIR and now under the mediation of the elderly persons, the parties have decided to bury the hatchet forever.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the petition.

5. Heard, perused the material available on record more particularly the nature of allegat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top