HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI, J
Bhinyaram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Order :
1. The instant criminal misc. Petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS for quashing of proceedings in Case No.107/2017 pending in the Court of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Balotra arising out of FIR No.209/2012 registered at Police Station Pachpadra, District Barmer for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 471 and 120-B of IPC.
2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the dispute in between the parties has been resolved through an amicable settlement and now, there remains no controversy in between them and the parties do not wish to continue the criminal proceedings further.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the petition.
4. Learned counsel appearing for complainant-respondent admits the fact of compromise and submits that he is willing if the FIR and the proceedings are quashed on the basis of compromise entered in between the parties.
5. Heard, perused the material available on record more particularly the police report, nature of allegation and the compromise deed executed in between the parties. The parties to the lis have resolved their dispute amicably and do not wish to continue the criminal proceedings and have jointl
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on an amicable settlement when the offences are personal in nature and do not affect public peace.
Court can quash criminal proceedings based on amicable settlement in personal disputes not affecting public peace, even if some offences are non-compoundable.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings based on amicable settlement if the dispute is personal and does not affect public peace.
Quashing of criminal proceedings is permissible when parties reach an amicable settlement and the dispute is personal, not affecting public peace.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings when parties reach an amicable settlement in personal disputes that do not affect public peace, exercising inherent powers under Section 528.
The High Court has the inherent power to quash FIRs for personal disputes that do not affect public peace, even if some offences are non-compoundable.
The High Court can quash FIRs for personal disputes that do not affect public peace, emphasizing the importance of amicable settlements in maintaining harmony.
The court can quash FIRs for personal disputes through amicable settlements, even if some offences are non-compoundable, to maintain peace and harmony.
The court may quash FIRs for non-compoundable offences if parties reach an amicable settlement, promoting harmony and justice.
The High Court can quash non-compoundable criminal proceedings based on amicable settlements in personal disputes that do not affect public peace.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.