Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL, J
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Appellant
Versus
THE BOARD OF REVENUE – Respondent
Order :
1. Petitioners have neither complied with the order dated 12.07.2024 nor, the order dated 16.08.2022. However, in the interest of justice, they are granted last opportunity of four weeks to ensure compliance of both the orders failing which this civil writ petition shall stand dismissed without reference to the Court.
2. If compliance is made within time, list this matter on 10.03.2025.
In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8218/2016:-
3. For the reasons stated in the application No. 1/2020 filed by Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Defence as well as Defence Estate Officer, Jaipur seeking impleadment as party respondents No.3 & 4, which is not opposed by learned counsel for the petitioner, the same is allowed. The Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Defence as well as the Defence Estate Officer are impleaded as respondent No. 3 & 4. Amended cause title appended with the application is taken on record.
4. List this matter on 10.03.2025. Application No.1/2019 stands disposed of accordingly.
In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17766/2016:-
5. For the reasons stated in the application No. 1/2022 filed for taking on record the legal representatives of deceased respondent No
Court emphasizes compliance with procedural orders, granting specific timelines and consequences for non-compliance in civil writ petitions.
(1) A litigant can be non-suited in case he is found guilty of concealing material facts from court.(2) Mere notings in file do not amount to an order – Unless an order is communicated to a party, n....
The court emphasized the right to timely resolution of pension claims for retired employees, acknowledging delays caused in typical proceedings.
Importance of providing an opportunity for parties to file replies on merits before disposing of a writ petition.
Adherence to procedural timelines is critical for ensuring fairness in judicial proceedings.
The court emphasized that the law of limitation applies equally to all parties, including the government, and failure to act within a reasonable time results in dismissal of claims.
Writ petition abates if legal representatives of deceased respondent not substituted timely.
The Union of India cannot challenge tribunal orders after significant delay without valid justification, emphasizing the importance of timely legal action.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
