SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 1008

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI, J
Megraj @ Meghraj – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Doulat Ram, Mr. Vikram Rajpurohit, Dy.G.A., Mr. Vikash Vishnoi

Order :

1. The instant criminal misc. petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNS S on behalf of the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.382/2024 registered at Police Station Panchpadra, District Balotra for the offences under Sections 115(2) , 126(2) , 127(2) , 308(6) , 3(5) of BNS on the ground of compromise.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the dispute in this matter is inter se between the parties which does not affect the societal interest or anyway disturb the tranquility or public peace. It is further submitted that dispute in between the parties has been resolved through an amicable settlement, for which a compromise-deed has been executed and submitted before this Court, and now, there remains no controversy in between them and the parties do not wish to continue the criminal proceedings further.

3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for complainant-respondent No.2 admits the fact of compromise and submits that complainant-respondent No.2 is willing if the FIR and the proceedings are quashed on the basis of compromise entered in between the parties.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the petition.

5. Heard learned counsel for the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top