SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 518

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MUNNURI LAXMAN
JAGDEV SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 1976 / 2024



Advocates:
Mr. Pankaj Sharma, Dr. Milap Chopra, Mr. Kanishq Singhvi

The court mandated a reassessment of the irrigation watercourse's impact on agricultural operations, emphasizing adherence to sanction plans and maintaining status quo until a decision is rendered.

Headnote:(A) Relevant laws and sections not specified - Writ Petition - The petitioner seeks to challenge the orders affecting irrigation supply and watercourse construction. The grievance stems from the alteration of a watercourse that allegedly hinders agricultural operations. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Administrative Authority - The court found that the impugned orders lacked a definitive finding regarding the impact of the existing watercourse on the private respondent's water drawing capacity. (Paras 5-6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner claims that the extension of the watercourse, initiated by the private respondent, was unauthorized and detrimental to their agricultural activities.

Findings of Court:
The court set aside the orders of the Executive Engineer and Superintending Engineer, remanding the matter back for proper adjudication of the watercourse's impact.

Issues: The main issues were whether the existing watercourse affected the water drawing capacity of the private respondent and the legitimacy of the extension of the watercourse.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the Executive Engineer must determine the watercourse's impact and ensure compliance with the sanction plan while maintaining the status quo until a decision is made.

Result: Writ petitions disposed of with directions.

Order :

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14047/2024:

1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:

“I. The judgment / order dated 28.12.20224 as passed by respondent no.1 in appeal no.94/2023 (Harbhajan Singh & Anr. vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) and the order dated 05.12.2023 passed by Respondent no.2 upon the application preferred by respondent no. 3.may kindly be set-aside and quashed.

II. The application preferred by the present Respondent no.3 (Annex.-3) may kindly be rejected in toto.

III. The respondents may kindly be directed to restore the irrigation supply from the constructed water course up to mid of Kila no.5 of Murabba no.44 and further continue water supply through the diagonally constructed water course for the purpose of connecting to the more than 50-years-old katchawater course.

IV. The respondents may kindly be directed to close the naka i.e. the point created by breaking the pakka water course in the mid of kila no.1 Murabba no.43.

V. Any other relief with this Hon’ble Court deems fit may also kindly be granted in favour of the petitioner.”

2. The main grievance of the petitioner is that consensually a pakka watercourse was built by the Command Area Development Department and part of the pakka watercourse was built by the farmers. The respondent authorities at the behest of the private respondent herein have further extended the watercourse on the premise that the existing watercourse has been hampering the movement of the agricultural implements which is beyond the powers of the CAD Department and that has to be decided by the revenue authorities.

3. Learned counsel for the private respondent has contended that the grievance before the authorities was only whether the watercourse that has been existing are within the sanction plan. The private respondent’s claim is that he sought the irrigation authorities to create the watercourse as per the sanction plan. According to him, the watercourse that was created earlier was causing hindrance to the drawing of water to his field, therefore, subsequently, the extension of watercourse was in terms of the sanction plan.

4. Heard both the sides.

5. The impugned order passed by the Executive Engineer as well as the Superintending Engineer has not specifically given a finding whether the previous existing watercourse has impacted the water drawing capacity of the private respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that by virtue of extension of watercourse, the water drawing capacity of water of the private respondent has diminished and, therefore, this issue has to be adjudicated by the original authority.

6. In light of such consensual agreement between the parties, the writ petitions are disposed of with the following directions:

i. The impugned order passed by the Executive Engineer and Superintending Engineer is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Executive Engineer.

ii. The Executive Engineer is directed to decide whether the existing watercourse, if it was not extended, would diminish the water drawing capacity of the private respondent and respondent authorities shall also see that the watercourse must be taking into consideration the sanction plan and at the same time the existing way if any held by the petitioner shall not be disturbed by virtue of any implementation the sanction plan.

iii. Till such decision is taken, the existing status quo with regard to watercourse shall not be disturbed.

iv. The authorities shall decide the grievance within a reasonable time which shall not be more than two months.

v. Any observation made in the present order shall not come in the way of deciding the issue.

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1976/2024:

In light of the order passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14047/2024, the present writ petition is disposed of. The impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top