SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 567

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
MANGALA RAM – Appellant
Versus
RAJEEV – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Shambhoo Singh, Mr. Kuldeep Singh Kumpawat, Asst. to Mr. Deepak Choudhary, AAG

Order :

1. Heard.

2. Admit.

3. Issue notice.

4. Learned Asst. to Addl. Advocate General accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2-State. Thus, notice be issued to the respondent No.1, returnable within eight weeks.

5. Call for record.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Asst. to Addl. Advocate General on application for suspension of sentence No.16/2025.

6. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of the petitioner and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the substantive sentence awarded to the accused petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 438/442 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the substantive sentences passed by the Learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhinmal, in Criminal Case No.187/2018 vide order dated 26.02.2021 as affirmed by the Learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhinmal, District Jalore, vide order dated 21.10.2024 in Cr. Appeal No.20/2021 against the petitioner-applicant Mangala Ram S/o Shri Hoti shall remain suspended, till final disposal of the aforesaid revision and he shall be released on bail,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top