SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 745

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
JAIPRAKASH @ KALU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLAS / 363 / 2025



Advocates:
Ms. Anjali Verma, Mr. Deepak Choudhary, GA cum AAG with Mr. Kuldeep Singh Kumpawat

The court may suspend a sentence pending appeal if justified by the circumstances, subject to compliance with specified bail conditions.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 430 (Old Section 389) - Application for suspension of sentence - The court finds it appropriate to suspend the sentence awarded to the accused pending appeal due to the likelihood of delayed proceedings - Bail granted on conditions of personal bond and sureties. (Paras 6-7)

(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - Accused must appear before the trial court annually and notify any changes in residence to both the trial court and counsel - Non-compliance may lead to bail cancellation. (Paras 7-8)

Facts of the case:
The application for suspension of sentence was filed by the accused in light of the lengthy appeal process, leading the court to consider the suspension of the sentence imposed by the Sessions Judge in January 2025.

Findings of Court:
The application for suspension of sentence is allowed, allowing the accused to be released on bail under specified conditions.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the sentence should be suspended pending the appeal, considering the time required for the appeal process.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the case warranted suspension of the sentence due to the expected duration of the appeal process, emphasizing the need for the accused to comply with specified bail conditions.

Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.

ORDER :

1. Heard.

2. Admit. Issue Notice.

3. Learned AAG accepts notice on behalf of respondent - State.

4. Call for record.

5. Heard on application for suspension of sentence No.337/2025.

6. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced by the appellant(s) and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the fact that hearing of the appeal is likely to take time, therefore, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellant(s).

7. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 430 BNSS [Old Section 389 Cr.P.C.] is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge, District Churu vide judgment dated 31.01.2025 in Sessions Case No.34/2022 against the appellant-applicant(s) –1. Jaiprakash @ Kalu S/o Mahesh Kumar, 2. Vikas S/o Mahesh Kumar, 3. Mahesh Kumar S/o Mahaveer Prasad and 4. Mahaveer S/o Pemaram shall remain suspended till final disposal of the appeal and he/she/they shall be released on bail provided he/she/they execute a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his/her/their appearance in this court on 21.03.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

8. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant(s) were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant(s) do not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top