SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 628

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
HARMESH SINGH @ JORA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Sunil Vishnoi, Mr. Urja Ram Kalbi, PP

ORDER :

(KULDEEP MATHUR, J.)

This application for bail under Section 483 BNSS (439 Cr.P.C .) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.155/2024 registered at Police Station Hindumalkot, Dist. Sri Ganganagar, for the offences under Sections 8/21 and 25 of NDPS Act.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the contraband (Heroin) weighing 2.37 Kgs. was recovered from the conscious possession of co-accused persons namely Sandeep Singh @ CP and Balvindra Singh. Co-accused Balvinder Singh in the information divulged by him under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act stated that about two months prior to the date of recovery, he along with another co-accused Kuldeep Singh had kept the recovered contraband with the present petitioner.

4. Learned counsel submitted that apart from the disclosure statement of co-accused persons, there is no direct/ circumstantial evidence available on record indicating involvement of the present petitioner in commission of the alleged crime.

5. Lastly, learned counsel submitted that the petitione

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top