SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 648

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
PARTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Anuj Sahlot, Mr. Shrawan Singh, PP

ORDER :

(KULDEEP MATHUR, J.)

These applications for bail under Section 483 of BNSS (439 Cr.P.C.) have been filed by the petitioners who have been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.202/2024 registered at Police Station Salumber, District Udaipur, for the offences punishable under Sections 61(2) of BNS.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that co-accused persons namely Keshulal @ Keshiya (S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.29/2025) and Bhera @ Nanalal & Ramesh (S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.30/2025) have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 28.01.2025. Learned counsel submitted that the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable from that of above named co-accused persons who have already been enlarged on bail.

4. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody; offences alleged to have been committed by them are triable by Court of Magistrate and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioners.

5. Per contra, learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top